• Cliff Equity
  • Posts
  • 📈 Hedge Fund Fraudster’s ÂŁ1bn Scheme Crumbles

📈 Hedge Fund Fraudster’s £1bn Scheme Crumbles

Shein’s IPO Listing Caught in Labour Storm

In partnership with

This is Cliff Equity, the UK’s business newsletter that keeps you informed on what’s important in tech, business and finance in less than 5 minutes

In today’s stories:

  • Hedge Fund Fraudster’s ÂŁ1bn Scheme Crumbles

  • Shein’s IPO Listing Caught in Labour Storm

  • Ofcom Slaps Royal Mail with ÂŁ10.5m Fine

The summary: A British hedge funder’s billion-pound tax scam has landed him 12 years in a Danish jail, a Santa hat-infused trial, and a lifetime ban from creative accounting—and Denmark!

The details:

  • 12 years behind bars and ÂŁ1bn seized: British financier Sanjay Shah gets Denmark’s harshest fraud sentence ever for masterminding a ÂŁ1bn tax scam. Assets, properties, and a warm welcome to Denmark? All permanently banned.

  • From loophole to lock-up: Shah, claiming he merely exploited legal grey areas, ran a cum-ex scheme so intricate it duped the Danish treasury out of billions between 2012-2015. The court called it a masterclass in fraud.

  • A festive flair for crime: Donning a Santa hat in court, Shah was unfazed by the verdict, flashing reporters a grin and quipping, “See you next year” after appealing his sentence.

  • Lavish life to legal limbo: Once hosting Dubai parties with A-listers, Shah now faces a parallel tax fraud case in London—because one court drama clearly wasn’t enough.

Why it matters: Sanjay Shah’s escapades show that even the sharpest suits can end up behind bars when they cut corners too finely. His case is a stark reminder to governments (and their coffers) that creative accounting can cost billions if left unchecked. For the rest of us, it’s proof that wearing a Santa hat won’t make anyone too jolly to face justice.

Billionaires wanted it, but 66,930 everyday investors got it first.

When incredibly valuable assets come up for sale, it's typically the wealthiest people that end up taking home an amazing investment. But not always


One platform is taking on the billionaires at their own game, buying up and securitizing some of the most prized blue-chip artworks for its investors.

It's called Masterworks. Their nearly $1 billion collection includes works by greats like Banksy, Picasso, and Basquiat. When Masterworks sells a painting – like the 23 it's already sold – investors reap their portion of the net proceeds.

In just the last few years, Masterworks investors have realized net annualized returns like +17.6%, +17.8%, and +21.5% (from 3 illustrative sales held longer than one year).

Past performance not indicative of future returns. Investing Involves Risk. See Important Disclosures at masterworks.com/cd.

The summary: Shein’s London IPO is a high-stakes catwalk where ethical scrutiny, activist pressure, and government ambitions collide to shape the future of the UK’s financial runway.

The details:

  • Regulators' Thread Count Check: Shein’s London IPO is tangled in delays as the FCA scrutinises supply chain practices amidst allegations of forced labour and legal challenges from Uyghur advocacy groups.

  • Labour Pains: Both the UK’s Independent Anti-Slavery Commissioner and NGOs have flagged ethical concerns, while Shein touts isotopic cotton testing and a zero-tolerance forced labour policy—though a couple of child labour cases slipped through this year.

  • Global Stitch-Up: Shein's approval process also hinges on green lights from China and compliance with EU and US forced labour laws, making the UK’s modern slavery rules seem a bit off-trend.

  • IPO Tightrope: With the Labour government urging less risk-averse regulation, the FCA must weigh Shein’s ÂŁ66bn ambitions against legal risks and activist scrutiny, mindful that fast fashion’s ethical skeletons aren’t confined to budget brands.

Why it matters: Shein's IPO saga isn’t just about fast fashion; it’s a litmus test for whether London’s markets can juggle big business ambitions with ethical backbone. The FCA finds itself threading the needle between activist watchdogs, international scrutiny, and a government desperate to revive the IPO scene. If Shein makes the cut, it sets a precedent for how much compromise the City is willing to stitch into its financial fabric.

The summary: Royal Mail’s £10.5m fine and the pressure to improve delivery times could be just the nudge needed to get its postman back on track and restore some good old-fashioned reliability!

The details:

  • Royal Snail Fined Again: Royal Mail's tardy delivery rates (74.7% for first class, 92.7% for second) have earned it a ÂŁ10.5m slap from Ofcom, far shy of its targets (93% and 98.5%).

  • Excuses, Excuses: Blaming finances and industrial disputes didn’t cut it with Ofcom, who said Royal Mail's "insufficient and ineffective" efforts failed millions of customers.

  • Fix It, Fast: Ofcom expects a proper plan and quicker progress, warning Royal Mail’s sluggish improvements are eroding public trust.

  • The Road Ahead: Royal Mail promises change with a "quality action plan" and hints its six-day-a-week letter service might need a revamp—but Ofcom isn’t buying vague promises.

Why it matters: Royal Mail's delays hit where it hurts most: our trust in a national institution and our letterboxes. With fines piling up and Ofcom's patience wearing thin, the pressure is on for a revamp—or risk being stamped as outdated. At stake is the reliability of a service many still count on, even in the age of instant messages.