• Cliff Equity
  • Posts
  • 📈 Vodafone’s £120m Franchise Fury Unleashed

📈 Vodafone’s £120m Franchise Fury Unleashed

Sycamore’s $10bn Bid Stirs the Pot

December 11, 2024

This is Cliff Equity, the UK’s business newsletter that keeps you informed on what’s important in tech, business and finance in less than 5 minutes

In today’s stories:

  • Vodafone’s £120m Franchise Fury Unleashed

  • Sycamore’s $10bn Bid Stirs the Pot

  • Harrods’ Christmas Strikes: Tinsel Meets Tension!

The summary: Vodafone faces a £120m legal spat with franchisees over alleged dodgy dealings, just as it celebrates a £16.5bn merger with Three—proof that even telecom titans can’t dodge a bit of drama!

The details:

  • Vodafone's £120m Franchise Fiasco: 61 franchisees are taking the telecoms titan to court, claiming "bad faith" and breach of good faith agreements after a string of arbitrary decisions since July 2020.

  • Broken Promises & Financial Woes: Franchisees accuse Vodafone of luring them with dreams of uncapped earnings, only to deliver loss-making commission structures. Adding insult to injury, Vodafone allegedly pocketed Covid rate relief meant for struggling stores.

  • A Nightmare for Some: Andrew Kerr, a Northern Irish franchisee, described his journey with Vodafone as a descent into financial ruin, claiming the telecom giant turned him into their personal piggy bank.

  • Vodafone’s Counterpunch: The company denies the allegations, insisting most franchises are profitable and issues have been addressed. Meanwhile, they recently secured a £16.5bn merger with Three, approved by the regulator last week.

Why it matters: Vodafone, the poster child of British telecoms, is facing a £120m courtroom showdown, raising eyebrows about its treatment of small business partners. Allegations of dodgy dealings and pandemic profiteering risk tarnishing its reputation just as it celebrates a £16.5bn merger with Three. If the franchisees win, it could set a precedent for how big brands treat their smaller allies—or, as some might say, their "piggy banks."

1 in 16 are diagnosed with lung cancer.

  • Early detection saves lives

  • Cizzle Bio’s test is 95% accurate

  • You can support a patented solution to improve survival rates

Read the Offering information carefully before investing. It contains details of the issuer’s business, risks, charges, expenses, and other information, which should be considered before investing. Obtain a Form C and Offering Memorandum at invest.cizzlebio.com

The summary: Boots, the beloved British high street staple, could see a fresh start as Sycamore Partners plots a $10bn takeover of its US parent, with a dash of drama, heritage, and a possible homecoming for Stefano Pessina.

The details:

  • Boots on the Block (Again): A $10bn+ takeover bid for Walgreens Boots Alliance (WBA) by Sycamore Partners could reignite the auction for Boots, the Nottingham-born retail gem, after years of failed sale attempts.

  • From Manhattan to Nottingham: Sycamore eyes Boots as a standalone prize, with Stefano Pessina—the Italian dealmaker and 17% WBA stakeholder—potentially stepping in as Boots’ leading man.

  • History vs. Market Woes: Despite its 175-year legacy, 1,900 stores, and 52,000 employees, Boots has struggled to find a suitor, with past offers from Apollo and others deemed underwhelming.

  • New Leadership, Old Charm: With a fresh CEO at the helm and a heritage dating back to its herbal remedy roots in 1849, Boots may yet polish its image for a future buyer—or a return to private hands.

Why it matters: Boots, a cornerstone of the British high street, finds itself at the centre of yet another ownership shuffle, which could decide the future of its 52,000 employees and nearly 2,000 stores. With Stefano Pessina possibly retaking the reins, it’s a bit like the prodigal owner coming home—though whether it’s for glory or graft remains to be seen. Meanwhile, Sycamore's takeover attempt hints at shifting priorities in global retail, where even heritage giants like Boots are up for grabs in the race for reinvention.

The summary: Harrods' festive strike over pay and perks is turning up the heat on luxury retailers, with workers demanding more than just a shiny Christmas – they want fair wages and proper perks, making it a season of change in Knightsbridge!

The details:

  • Christmas Clash at Harrods: Staff from cleaners to restaurant workers are set to strike during key festive shopping days, citing low pay, no Christmas bonus, and harsh working conditions. Boxing Day bargains might come with a side of picket lines.

  • Union vs. Luxury: The UVW union claims Harrods bosses refuse to negotiate, forcing workers to down tools. Meanwhile, Harrods’ Qatari owners pocketed a hefty £180m dividend last year despite profits taking a nosedive.

  • From Living Wage to Luxury Disgrace: Workers say they’re stuck on living wages without basic perks, as Harrods boasts about staff pay rises and dismisses the strikers as a "fractional minority."

  • The Grinch Who Stole Christmas Perks? Harrods insists it values staff but denies recognising UVW. Strikers demand a fairer slice of the pie, including a £500 bonus, better working conditions, and transparency in tipping policies.

Why it matters: Harrods, the epitome of luxury, is facing a festive rebellion that lays bare the gulf between its glossy image and the reality for workers earning barely enough to shop in its own store. It’s a sharp reminder that even in Britain’s poshest postcode, wage disputes and unfair perks can cut through the tinsel and glamour. If the strikers prevail, it might just nudge other high-end employers to rethink their priorities—or at least their Christmas bonuses.